Date: | 1710, June 12 |
Author: | Zacharias Conrad von Uffenbach (1683–1734), German scholar, bibliophile, book-collector, traveller, palaeographer, and consul in Frankfurt am Main who is best known today for his published travelogues |
Title: | Merkwürdige Reisen durch Niedersachsen Holland und Engelland (Ulm, 1753). Originally published in German, an English Translation, (minus the relevant plate), was published in 1934 under the title London in 1710. |
About: | During his travels, von Uffenbach visited Flamsteed at the Observatory on 12 June 1710. His account of this visit (pp. 445–451), includes a detailed description (with plate) of a quadrant housed in the Quadrant House (or possibly the Sextant House). Given the date of his visit, the instrument is most likely to have been Flamsteed’s Mural Arc, the only other instrument in the vicinity being Flamsteed’s 7-foot Equatorial Sextant. However, the published plate bears little resemblance to the view of the Mural Arc that was published in Flamsteed’s Historia Coelestis Britannica, (London, 1725). Nor does it resemble the plate of the Equatorial Sextant (engraved by Francis Place after Robert Thacker c.1676) that was also included in Flamsteed's Historia Coelestis Britannica. Nor does it resemble the Francis Place engraving of Hooke’s 10-foot Mural Quadrant, an earlier instrument that had long since abandoned by Flamsteed and almost certainly disposed of. Allan Chapman and Derek Howse (both leading authorities), believe the instrument described and illustrated to be Flamsteed’s Mural Arc. |
Images: |
One plate (see above). |
Click here to read in original format (in German) |
|
Click here to view the plate (as originally published) |
[The translation below by Margaret Mare, and William Henry Quarrell comes from London in 1710, from travels of Zacharias Conrad von Uffenbach, (London, 1934). pp.20–26. Their notes have been omitted. The plate is from Merkwürdige Reisen durch Niedersachsen Holland und Engelland (Ulm, 1753) and is reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0) licence courtesy of Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel]
On the morning of 12 June [1710] we took a boat and were rowed down the Thames to
GREENWICH – six English miles.
It was very pleasant to journey down the Thames and the time passed mighty quick, because we were on the ebb tide. When we came to the bridge, we got out for a little and went on foot to the end of the bridge and let the boatman pass through alone, for the current there is so strong that small boats often capsize. On the other side of the bridge we got into the boat again. When we came to Greenwich we first looked at the wonderful Hospital for mariners and sailors, which is much more elegantly and magnificently planned than the Chelsey Hospital. They have now been at work on it for fourteen years, but it is only half finished. No royal palace can be more sumptuous. It costs prodigious sums of money, so that each sailor has sixpence deducted every month from his pay to be spent on the building. The great Hall, which was nearly finished, is so magnificent that it cost a thousand pounds to paint the ceiling alone. This Hall is a hundred and seven feet long, fifty-one feet six inches broad and twenty-four feet high. It has been built by ‘Mr. James Tornhill at St. Paul’s Church’. On the one side of the whole building which was entirely finished, we counted on the outside alone twenty-five pairs of columns, which are all very high, strong and elegant. But it is not so easy to describe this building as to see it in the engravings there are of it. The above-mentioned Hall will in the future be used as a dining-room. There is another already finished where the seamen come together to smoke their pipes, in which, moreover, there are fires burning.
Next the building is an exceedingly pleasant park or zoological garden, where there are many deer which are uncommonly tame. I believe that there cannot be a more charming spot in the world than this park, for in it there is a high hill with very fine trees. When one climbs it, one has not only a view of the Thames for a great distance but of London on the opposite bank and on the other of wide stretches of country. On the top of this hill Mr. John Flamsteed, the illustrious Astronomer Royal, has his residence and observatory. He could find nowhere in the world a more convenient and pleasant situation. We waited on him, and he had us shown into his Museum, since he was quite crippled with gout. He received us with uncommon civility (which is in England most unusual). For an Englishman he spoke fairly good and fluent Latin, and he did not pronounce it with too much of an English accent, so that we could understand each other quite well. He was also well acquainted with our German mathematicians, such as Sturm, Weigel, Bernouilli, and he spoke of them with much pleasure, asking us questions about them. After we had conversed for some time, he showed us a prodigious quantity of his written observations which he has been making for the last thirty years, especially for the benefit of navigation. He has published very little under his name with the exception of some ‘observationes’ in the ‘Transactionibus’ of the Society in London. He certainly has a pension, but this, as he told us himself, is so small that, if he were not the son of a rich merchant, he would not have been able to accomplish much. He is, moreover, of a weakly constitution, and is an ugly little fellow of about sixty years of age, but his industry is untiring. Among other things he showed us how he had entirely disproved Bayer and his constellation or ‘Asterismos’, and he lamented that neither Bayer nor others had rightly understood the Ptolomaeum. He has shown great zeal in emending and restoring the Ptolomaeum. I will only give you one example which occurs to me. He pointed out to us that Sagittarius must be holding his bow in his left hand and drawing it with his right, with his face turned forwards, which is entirely contrary to the views of Bayer and all other Astronomers. He also pointed out to us that innumerable fixed stars had been marked quite incorrectly. When I said to him it was a pity that he did not edit the Ptolomaeum, he answered me that now that Prince George was dead, there was scarcely any hope of this. The latter had been well disposed both to him and to his science. It appears, moreover, that the love of the mathematical and physical sciences which for some time had been very great in England had almost entirely cooled off, and that among men of fashion in London it had declined and almost died out.
Reproduced under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0) licence courtesy of Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel (see above)
When we had once more taken leave of Mr Flamsteed, we should have liked to look at the house below in the park, which now belongs to the Queen, and the elegant staircase that is in it; but the time was too short, and we had to hasten homewards with the intention of coming back another time, so that we should miss neither our dinner nor the turn of the tide on the Thames. We therefore again got into our boat and were rowed Londonwards with the tide; and we risked passing right through the centre of the bridge, where the eddy and the waves were so violent that, when we were under the arch, the water was piled up on either side of us to a much greater height than we in our little ship. Earlier in the day, when we had watched our boat passing through the bridge, from the shore we could see neither boat nor boatman, so that one could well imagine that both were being sucked down by the water. We reached London at dinner time, that is after two o’clock, and in the afternoon we drove to the celebrated clockmaker’s, Buschmann.
© 2014 – 2025 Graham Dolan
Except where indicated, all text and images are the copyright of Graham Dolan